Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aeeADDomU6yAjCOb@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1 (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Apr-21, David Rowley wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 at 19:02, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > > PFA v8 - rebased and fixed a few new occurrences. > > Which of these are new to v19? Can you separate those ones out? IMO, > we should commit at least those, as those won't cause any backpatching > pain. I agree. The others are v20 material. Specifically about 0003 (v20 material for sure, as this is ancient code), I don't like this patch very much. I wonder if it would be possible to do away with the idea of using these codeFragment things without introducing a performance issue here. Is that doable by turning these macros into static functions? -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Puedes vivir sólo una vez, pero si lo haces bien, una vez es suficiente"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: