On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:23:23AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The thread [0] is proposing a patch to change these things in the opposite
> direction, effectively reverting commit 6dcfac9696c.
Thanks for the poke. This qualifies as an open item assigned to me, I
guess. I'll double-check the whole and reply on the other thread
where the patch has been posted at [1].
> The real problem here is that offset values that are uint32 are being output
> via the SQL type smallint, which can't handle the whole set of values, but
> this is probably not a problem in practice.
Will check all that.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ7c6TMcGu8qmRe1gZfJ-gOzVnZq-t%3Dfwn-UuyStx1w6ZyydMw%40mail.gmail.com
--
Michael