On 20/01/2020 08:44, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
>> Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
>> is an int not a smallint.
>>
> I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it,
Thanks!
> and barring objections,
> I'll start by ripping out the smallint code.
No strong objection.
--
Vik Fearing