Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | adan_E0o69p81lIj@nathan обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 02:53:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Oh. I'm not happy that any part of autovacuum.c is now reachable from > SQL: that's the sort of modularity violation that will bite us on the > ass (indeed just did). Aside from this problem, the elog's that > relation_needs_vacanalyze emits seem 100% inappropriate and misleading > when it's being called from the view. FWIW that elog() shouldn't be emitting anything from the view, unless something is broken. > I think perhaps the right way forward is to rethink the API > guarantees for pgstat_fetch_stat_tabentry_ext, as I speculated > about in 02502c1bc: > > [...] > > 2. Add a "bool *should_free" parameter, like we have in tuplestores > and some other places. It's on the caller to pfree if should_free > gets set, but since we'd have to touch every caller, we'd not miss > any. This sounds most similar to the "bool *may_free" idea that Andres just posted. IIUC the idea is that callers can free the result if they want, but they aren't required to do so. -- nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: