Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions
| От | Mark Wong |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | adWWX4jFbxib8oQ1@ltdrgnflg2 обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>) |
| Ответы |
Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 12:26:05AM +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote: > On 4/2/26 8:36 PM, Mark Wong wrote: > > I've attached v5, simply a needed rebase due to some other churn in > > pg_proc.dat. > > Nice, I like the patch. The code changes looks good and I like the > removal of these duplicate functions and use of default arguments. But I > think the names of the arguments should be aligned with the names we > have in the documentation. And that may mean that we should change the > documentation. Thanks! > For example: > > = Code > > pg_get_ruledef(rule, pretty) > > = Docs > > pg_get_ruledef(rule_oid, pretty_bool) > > = Should docs maybe be updated to the following? > > pg_get_ruledef(rule oid, pretty bool) I agree with the aligning the names, but maybe I was looking in a different place? In the doc/src/sgml/func/func-info.sgml (a4f774cf1c7e) I think I see pg_get_ruledef(rule oid, pretty bool) already: <function>pg_get_ruledef</function> ( <parameter>rule</parameter> <type>oid</type> <optional>, <parameter>pretty</parameter><type>boolean</type> </optional> ) I don't see any matches when I grep for rule_oid or pretty_bool... Regards, Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: