On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 03:19:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Now looking at it, and for the reason why 010 for concurrent indexes
> does not complain..
This one was a simple puzzle: there was a race condition between the
detach done by a local point and the wait/detach sequence. As we want
a detach, dropping the local point is proving to work here.
I am going to do a few more runs to gain some more confidence.
Bertrand, could you confirm please?
--
Michael