Re: remove bits* types
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: remove bits* types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | acqsERCb1t8OCZpG@nathan обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: remove bits* types (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: remove bits* types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 12:41:09PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 2:21 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 05:27:34PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > I'm mildly in favor of removing them. But it appears there is no consensus. >> >> Same here. While it still doesn't look like anybody is totally opposed to >> the idea, you are right that there is no consensus. > > I really wish we would remove them. I want fewer confusing typedefs in > the code -- not more. I'm quite sad that as of 1bd6f22f43ac1b we are > now using them more widely (and publicly), and I feel that was done > without consensus. It should just use a regular uint32 -- like other > places we do this (e.g. scan_begin() amongst many others). Thanks for the heads-up. Here's a rebased patch. With Melanie's note, there are at least 4 votes in favor of this patch (Andres, me, Peter, and Melanie). AFAICT Michael is +/-0, Álvaro and Tom are -1 (or somewhere in the vicinity), and Robert seems ambivalent. Hm... -- nathan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: