Re: remove bits* types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: remove bits* types
Дата
Msg-id acq6J5W_pe_DRP25@nathan
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remove bits* types  (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>)
Ответы Re: remove bits* types
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 06:36:48PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> To avoid breaking extensions, we could leave the typedefs in place with
> an #ifndef guard on some symbol that's only defined when building
> postgres itself, but not when building extensions (or vice versa with an
> #ifdef instead).
> 
> This is used a lot in Perl for things we don't want to use in core any
> more, but we don't want to break CPAN modules still using.

It's hard to get an exact count because the names are so common, but I'm
seeing <10 packages on codesearch.debian.net that might be affected, and
it's quite easy to fix (s/bits/uint/g).  My experience is that we routinely
"break" extensions like this in new major versions, too.  So, I'm not
convinced we need to do any kind of backward-compatibility work.  In any
case, we have a lot of time between now and GA, so if a bunch of angry
extension authors come to my door with pitchforks, we can reconsider.

-- 
nathan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: