Re: Segmentation fault in PostgreSQL 17.7 during REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Segmentation fault in PostgreSQL 17.7 during REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | acXE6BTCyk637Sol@paquier.xyz обсуждение |
| Ответ на | RE: Segmentation fault in PostgreSQL 17.7 during REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY (Ana Almeida <Ana.Almeida@timestamp.pt>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:26:36PM +0000, Ana Almeida wrote: > We executed DELETE, VACUUM, and REINDEX commands multiple > times. During one of the executions, the REINDEX operation failed > with the error: "could not open file". After this, we dropped and > recreated the database and repeated the tests. In one of the > executions, the same REINDEX command resulted in segmentation fault, > which caused the database to crash. When the REINDEX command failed, > it left behind temporary index copies with the _ccnew suffix. We > manually dropped these indexes and re-ran the REINDEX command, which > then completed successfully. I am afraid that it is one of these cases where having a self-contained workload to be able to reproduce the issue, even if the issue can be hit at a very low rate, would be super useful before we could categorize that as a backend core issue. I could buy that there is an in-core problem, but it's hard to justify the time investment based on an assumption that we may have a problem. FWIW, I have not seen such problematic error patterns lately, so it's hard to say. I'll double-check around me and see if there is some data to fish. Perhaps there is something matching with a portion of your problematic patterns, or that has a similar smell. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: