Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet?
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ab7d1d7f-7474-4735-860f-5de190cb31f8@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-12-30 Tu 5:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:standard_conforming_strings has defaulted to ON since 2010 (see 0839f312e in the 9.1 release). I propose that it's finally time to force it on and get rid of code that supports the "off" setting.Here's a draft patch series for that. As I was working through it, I realized that there's one potentially-nasty point that might cause upgrading problems. To wit, pg_dump and pg_dumpall have historically replicated the source server's standard_conforming_strings setting into their output: they emit a SET command for that, and any string literals appearing in views or the like will be escaped accordingly. So if your old installation had standard_conforming_strings = off, and all you have from it is existing pg_dump output (either text or archive format), you are in a sticky situation because that dump will not restore cleanly. This isn't impossible to get out of, but you'd probably have to stand up a pre-v19 server, restore the dump into that, and take a fresh dump made with standard_conforming_strings = on. The alternative would be manual correction of literals in the dump script, which seems far too error-prone to be recommendable.
Have we ever promised that dumps made using pg_dump/pg_dumpall from other than the target version work?
I don't see this as a big issue, unless I'm misunderstanding.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: