On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 12:22:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm content with the status quo personally, but perhaps it'd be
> worth adding some info to the comment for the bitsNN typedefs
> to make it clearer what they are intended for. I'm imagining
> something along the lines of
Not sure why we absolutely need to be aggressive with a removal here,
so I'm +/-0 on that. And there is always the argument of breaking the
compilation of out-of-core code. That would be easily fixable, still
always slightly annoying.
--
Michael