Re: pg_resetwal.c: duplicate '0' in hex character set for -l option validation

On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 09:16:12AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> In your recent batch commit
> 462fe0ff6215ae222fc866af621e4b86462289b1, I noticed that nobody was
> credited.

Please note that I have discussed this question with others offline,
hence the delay in my reply.

> Does this mean that people who report typo-like problems
> will no longer be credited?

Yes, that was on purpose.  We have seen a large increase of these
trivial patches to pgsql-hackers lately for some reason.  Maybe it is
LLMs or scanners or just a lot of new people with fresh eyes looking
at the code.  It started to get tedious to process them one by one,
and we discussed among committers if we could have a more lightweight
process for them.  As an experiment, I started to collect all such
changes into these larger batches.  Not crediting the reporters is
part of the experiment; tracking credit for trivial typo fixes is
hardly worth the effort, skipping that makes the process less
time-consuming.
--
Michael