Re: Remove redundant assignment in CreateWorkExprContext
| От | Bertrand Drouvot |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Remove redundant assignment in CreateWorkExprContext |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aWjR05UAyxNJq/ef@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Remove redundant assignment in CreateWorkExprContext (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 12:03:01PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 02:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Looking at the git history, CreateWorkExprContext was introduced in > > 50a38f651, and at that time it did some nontrivial calculations > > to adjust that initial value of maxBlockSize. Later, cc721c459 > > simplified matters but forgot to remove the now-useless > > initialization. So +1, unless Jeff has some reason to keep it > > like this? > > Right. Committed, thank you. FWIW, this thread gave me the idea to check for such cases in the entire code tree. I did it with the help of [1], and that would give: " 85 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) " This is quite large, so if we think that's worth the time and energy we could update a subset of files at a time per month. That would: - keep changes consistent within each file - ease the review(s) - avoid "large" rebases for patches waiting in the commitfest Thoughts? [1]: https://github.com/bdrouvot/coccinelle_on_pg/blob/main/misc/useless_assignment.cocci Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: