On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 04:58:39PM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> Maybe, I have stopped some more cases, in v2-0001
Right. It's true that we could be more consistent for all these based
on their base type, some of them, particularly in the GIN code now,
caring about using the correct macro. It may be a good occasion to
double-check the whole tree for similar holes based on unsigned types.
--
Michael