Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet?
| От | Julien Rouhaud |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aVuoC2zL3DA8tgOT@jrouhaud обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet? (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Can we remove support for standard_conforming_strings = off yet?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 05:03:48PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 1, 2026 at 12:04 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Personally I would call it a deal-breaker if I thought it'd affect > > more than a very very tiny number of people. But the entire premise > > of this patch is that nobody is using standard_conforming_strings = > > off in production anymore. If that isn't true it's probably a > > mistake to go forward anyway. > > FWIW, I spent a few minutes looking, and I only found issues from ~5 > years ago about software not working with the setting off. I didn't > see any details on what they were running in the application stack > that required it: > > https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/issues/1992 > > https://github.com/npgsql/npgsql/issues/3333 I had another one ~4 years ago: https://github.com/powa-team/powa-archivist/issues/51 Since I fixed powa-archivist at that time, I don't know if anyone else would have faced the same problem, although the OP is likely still using the same setting.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: