Hi,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 11:00:54AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> Given MAX_PHYSICAL_FILESIZE is just 1G (2^30), why availbytes has to be pgoff_t instead of just int?
I agree that int would work, but maybe it's using pgoff_t just to be on the safe
side of things should MAX_PHYSICAL_FILESIZE become 2^31 or higher one day?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com