Re: Enquiry about TDE with PgSQL
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enquiry about TDE with PgSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aQTolXT9EzCa3tiA@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enquiry about TDE with PgSQL (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Fri, 2025-10-31 at 08:21 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > Yeah, what I would like to know is how many of the data breaches > > actually grab directly from the storage versus getting it through the > > database or other software above the storage? It seems to me social > > engineering plays a bigger role in this. > > This is not about actual security considerations, it is about checkboxes. > Consequently, rational arguments are missing the point. I think the big question is that, now with the effective PCI spec disallowing only storage-level encryption, can we, as a project, continue to reject in-core TDE because it is a check-box item. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: