Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
| От | Mark Wong | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aP-hllbRdgqbmB8L@ltdrgnflg2 обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement (Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi everyone, On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:47:53PM +0530, Akshay Joshi wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:55 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have reviewed this patch before and provided a number of comments that > have been addressed by Akshay (so I encourage you to list my name and > this address in a Reviewed-by trailer line in the commit message). One > thing I had not noticed is that while this function has a "pretty" flag, > it doesn't use it to pass anything to pg_get_expr_worker()'s prettyFlags > argument, and I think it should -- probably just > > prettyFlags = GET_PRETTY_FLAGS(pretty); > > same as pg_get_querydef() does. Kinda sorta similar thought, I've noticed some existing functions like pg_get_constraintdef make the "pretty" flag optional, so I'm wondering if that scheme is also preferred here. I've attached a small diff to the original 0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch to illustrate the additional work to follow suit, if so desired. Regards, Mark -- Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com> EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: