Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
| От | Christoph Berg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aOj5NNxXdghSX66R@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels (Jimmy Angelakos <vyruss@hellug.gr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Список | pgsql-www |
Re: Jimmy Angelakos > Hi Christoph, > > I think "Significant Contributor" fits in between "Major Contributor" and "Contributor". > > "Sustained" has a time element and sounds terrible on a CV :-) , and "Recognised" is kind of redundant, since they're allrecognition levels. Hi, sorry for the long silence here, it's been holiday and conferences and work travel here for too long. We liked the "Significant" idea very much and had almost already settled on it when a new one came up: Notable Contributor. The levels would then be: Major Contributor Notable Contributor Contributor (see the other subthread) How do people like that? Frankly, "Significant" was apparently not sticking in anyone's brain, we constantly had to look it up again because it was competing with the other S-words "Sustained" and "Substantial". (Though I guess that would work out if we actually chose it.) Christoph
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: