Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aOPYeQQFyFwmIg0k@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: > > If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running > > the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter > > throws away the output. So it seems redundant to build a whole new code > > path for this. I think you can make the check target dependent on > > postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from > > pre-b2922562726): > > Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether? > It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs > took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder > if anyone else has either. I run 'make check' on the SGML every time I build the C code. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: