On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 09:33:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Great, I think this is a definite improvement. I saw someone recently
> complaining about this overuse of ok(), so thanks for doing the work to
> improve it.
Yeah, it's really cool to see someone step up and do all this leg
work for the existing code. I have not checked the patch in details
or if there are missing spots. Andrew, is that something you are
planning to do?
--
Michael