On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 09:32:41AM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> On 01/09/2025 10:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Also rethinking this aspect: a checksum failure probably *isn't* going
>> to make much difference. Since that'll also cause bigger problems for
>> VACUUM than logging one of these "failed to re-find parent key"
>> messages.
>
> But vacuum is not just logging this message. It throws error which means
> that vacuum for this relation will be performed any more.
Yeah. For a long-running autovacuum job, getting potentially random
in-flight failures is always annoying, more if these jobs deal with
wraparound.
--
Michael