Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aLUptKkboud-OZAw@paquier.xyz обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:32:41AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > Note that the main comment of slru.c still has one paragraph that mentions > "bank control lock" consistently before switching to just "control lock" in the > next paragraph. I'm assuming that it's ok in that context as it seems clear to > me that those are the same thing, just spelled with a less verbose name. Good catch, right. I am not seeing "control" used much as a term (3 times on HEAD). There is a lot of "bank lock" or "SLRU bank lock", both being mixed depending on the parts of the code using SLRUs (multixact, predicates, etc.). "SLRU bank lock" speaks a bit better to me, as the concept relates to.. SLRUs, but that's mostly a matter of taste between the three wordings, I guess. Do you have a preference? Not saying that one is better than the other as they're all used, just noticed the difference in the comments, with all the terms referring to the same thing. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: