On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 01:06:42PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Attached is v10,
I've been staring at the latest patch for a bit, and I'm a bit concerned
at how much complexity it adds. I think it's a good idea to keep a local
array of tranche names indexed by tranche ID, but the code for managing the
list of DSA pointers scares me. I know we were trying to avoid using
dshash earlier, if for no other reason than it's perhaps not the best data
structure for the job, but ISTM we'd eliminate a lot of complexity if we
offloaded the shmem pieces to a dshash table (or some other shmem-based
data structure we have yet to introduce, like a dslist/dsarray). WDYT?
--
nathan