Re: plan shape work
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plan shape work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aK4WIireNDeIACbt@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plan shape work (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:58:33AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > During planning, there is one range table per subquery; at the end if > planning, those separate range tables are flattened into a single > range table. Prior to this change, it was impractical for code > examining the final plan to understand which parts of the flattened > range table came from which subquery's range table. > > If the only consumer of the final plan is the executor, that is > completely fine. However, if some code wants to examine the final > plan, or what happens when we execute it, and extract information from > it that be used in future planning cycles, it's inconvenient. I am very interested in how plans can be used for future planning. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: