Re: don't include tableam.h in nbtree.h
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: don't include tableam.h in nbtree.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aJIcBkD0kUn+7dj/@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | don't include tableam.h in nbtree.h (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: don't include tableam.h in nbtree.h
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > I noticed that nbtree.h includes tableam.h. This seems rather random > and unnecessary. This patch removes it and fixes fallout, which is > pretty minimal. We do need to add a forward declaration of struct > TM_IndexDeleteOp (whose full definition appears in tableam.h) so that > _bt_delitems_delete_check()'s declaration can use it. I think that makes sense. index 1127597bb60..8282055ebca 100644 --- a/contrib/btree_gist/btree_bool.c +++ b/contrib/btree_gist/btree_bool.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include "btree_gist.h" #include "btree_utils_num.h" #include "utils/sortsupport.h" +#include "utils/rel.h" There is several places like this one where the new include is not ordered based on the ASCII values (while it looks like it should be according to 7e735035f2). Shouldn't that be the case? If so, PFA a patch to apply on top of your v1. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: