Re: Verify predefined LWLocks tranches have entries in wait_event_names.txt
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Verify predefined LWLocks tranches have entries in wait_event_names.txt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aH8udkgd9ayg/EKW@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Verify predefined LWLocks tranches have entries in wait_event_names.txt (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Verify predefined LWLocks tranches have entries in wait_event_names.txt
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:20:55PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 01:39:15PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > +#define PG_BUILTIN_LWTRANCHE(id, name) [id] = name, > > +#include "storage/lwlocktranchelist.h" > > +#undef PG_BUILTIN_LWTRANCHE > > Why not reuse PG_LWLOCK for this? I was not sure we'd want add a new file or add those in lwlocklist.h (in which case 2 macros would have been simpler). As it looks like we are going with a new file then yeah we can reuse PG_LWLOCK: done in v2 just shared up-thread. > > + # Stop recording if we reach another section. > > + last if /^Section:/; > > Can we add a note to wait_event_names.txt about the required > ordering/matching of the non-predefined LWLocks? Sure, done in v2 too. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: