On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 09:25:47PM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> I've attached modified and splited patch files to this mail.
Taken in isolation, 0001 was incorrect because it still contained the
case of "servicefile" nested to a service file, but this code path is
only introduced in 0002. I have extracted the relevant part of the
patch that works on HEAD, and applied it.
Attached is a rebased version of the rest, with the recent stanza
related to fef6da9e9c87 taken into account. 0002 still has a change
that should be in 0001: I have not really touched the structure of the
two remaining patches yet.
--
Michael