Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl)
От | Nico Williams |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aEMWiu1XLtU4HTyZ@ubby обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl) (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 08:41:20AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > I guess I'd be concerned that a hardware crypto provider might need > good-faith cleanup to work well. I understand they can't rely on > atexit in general, but there would be a big difference between "you > might have to clean up after a crash" and "every single connection > litters the hardware with unused stuff". I'd expect all subsystems to recover cleanly from unclean shutdowns. I know, that's a lot to expect, but nowadays pretty much all filesystems used in production do, for example. > But that's pure FUD and guesswork; I have no examples to point to, so > there might not be any providers that need that. I doubt that PG w/ OpenSSL in any configuration maintains stateful interactions with HW cryptographic providers.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: