Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id aEDsOuo4OuuvhhoU@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements  (Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:51:56AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
>> An enum would shine here IMO, because the value could be
>> self-documented and one would not need to guess what each integer
>> value means.  That could be something like a direction_keyword, filled
>> with FETCH_KEYWORD_LAST, FETCH_KEYWORD_BACKWARD, etc.
>
> Done in v4.

Mostly good here, some more comments.

+  * If an direction_keyword (i.e., FETCH FORWARD) is used, set this field
+  * to distinguish it from its numeric counterpart (i.e., FETCH 1). This
+  * value is set only within gram.y.

One nitpick comment here is that I would have mentioned that this
matters for query jumbling.

The tests can be in cursors.sql and not utility.sql, which is the test
area for...  Cursors.  :D

FetchDirectionKeywords could be in typedefs.list to avoid the
indentation accident with the structure definition.  There's no actual
practice about that for committers, this note will just serve as a
self-reminder once the v19 branch opens for business when I handle
this patch.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: