Re: Should shared_preload_libraries be loaded during binary upgrade?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should shared_preload_libraries be loaded during binary upgrade? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aBN7gqSuVVZZtoKD@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should shared_preload_libraries be loaded during binary upgrade? (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should shared_preload_libraries be loaded during binary upgrade?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:05:56AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > Does it make sense to load "shared_preload_libraries" during binary > upgrade mode? > > An extension might unintentionally interfere with pg_upgrade, for > example, by connecting to the 'postgres' database, which can cause the > upgrade to fail as the restore needs to drop that database. While it's > true that extensions should ideally handle this themselves, wouldn't > it be safer if we could avoid loading them at all during the binary > upgrade mode? Well, the library might be required to load the data. Why would we avoid it with no known error reports? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: