Re: add --sequence-data to pg_dumpall
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: add --sequence-data to pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aBJ_e5RXk92N5-U1@nathan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: add --sequence-data to pg_dumpall (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: add --sequence-data to pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:29:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:55:08PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> Assuming we want this patch, should we apply it to v18? It's arguably an >> oversight in the pg_dump --sequence-data commit, and pg_dumpall will just >> pass the option through to pg_dump, but otherwise there's not a really >> strong reason it can't wait. > > This reminds me of, that fixed a similar defect in pg_dumpall > following the addition of an option in pg_dump where the former was > forgotten: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YKHC%2BqCJvzCRVCpY%40paquier.xyz > > I agree with applying that to v18 now and treat it as a defect rather > than wait for v19 and treat this patch as a new feature. Bonus points > for the patch being straight-forward. Since there's precedent, I'll plan on committing this in the next few days unless someone objects. I've added the rest of the RMT to this thread, too, just in case. -- nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: