Re: pg_upgrade-breaking release
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade-breaking release |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aApSVm7SmUd76WIc@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade-breaking release (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:51:08PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Apr-24, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Do we think most people are _not_ going to use pg_upgrade now that we > > are defaulting to checksums being enabled by default in PG 18? And if > > so, do we think we are ever going to have a storage-format-changing > > release where pg_upgrade cannot be used? > > Peter E posted a patch that allowed pg_upgrade to migrate (rewrite) > files from non-checksummed to checksummed, but he appears to have given > up on it for this release given an apparent lack of interest. > https://postgr.es/m/57957aca-3eae-4106-afb2-3008122b9950@eisentraut.org Yeah, I saw that, and I think we could do something similar for TDE if we ever had it. I think we are suggesting people just do offline addition of checksums rather than trying to do something fancy with pg_upgrade. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: