Re: reduce size of logs stored by buildfarm
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: reduce size of logs stored by buildfarm |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | a9db7d10-a941-46bc-80b7-d9c616097af3@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: reduce size of logs stored by buildfarm (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: reduce size of logs stored by buildfarm
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-11-25 Tu 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes: >> With these three patches, we go from having 62 MB bytes in files with >> "log" in their names under testrun/ (except those that have "catalog") >> to 30 MB. I think that's not a bad reduction. > I wonder how much this overlaps with what Andrew just did > to the BF client [1]. > > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/601bb91d-b55d-4fa6-bb57-c2126fb22620%40dunslane.net > > Pretty much none of it, although both Alvaro and I are clearly motivated by the same thing, namely disk space pressure on the buildfarm server. I think his patches 1 and 3 seem like no-brainers. I did two things in the BF client: . prevent uploading redundant copies of the same file in meson builds (this was a bug) . inhibit loading postmaster log files from installcheck runs and cross-version upgrade runs, but only if there hasn't been a failure. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: