On 27/6/21 18:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:48:45PM +0300, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
>>> This problem affects PG 9.6 - 13. The master branch was fixed 9 months ago
>>> by commit 83158f7, that made this operation transactional, but still.
>
>> This looks like a good argument for back-patching 83158f7 all the way
>> down, as 813fb03 exists since 9.4. Any thoughts from others?
>
> +1 ... 83158f7 has survived long enough to have reasonable confidence
> in it.
Technically, 83158f7 is trivial patch. I think, some efforts is required
only for PG9.6. I prepared a patch for this version.
--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional