On 24.11.25 06:00, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I think something like attached should fix the problem, if we want to
> continue with the current example. FWIW, it demos that quotes can be
> used with labels, but we don't necessarily do that with other objects.
> I am not sure whether Peter would like to continue with the example or
> use a different one avoiding this subtlety altogether. Hence not
> including it in the overall patchset.
Let's just quote it.
I think this example set is nice because it is aligned with examples
used elsewhere in the ddl.sgml chapter, such as foreign keys and as of
recently temporal tables.