On 2025/06/02 14:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 30.05.25 18:12, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On 2025/05/31 0:28, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>> Otherwise, maybe "log_lock_failures" would be better.
>>>
>>> Yes, this seems better for consistency with log_lock_waits.
>>
>> Patch attached.
>
> This looks good to me.
I've pushed the patch. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation