On 2/1/19 2:51 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> (I admit to not having the best grasp on how all this works, so feel
>> free to shoot this down)
>>
> I think the key question here is whether or not you can cope with
> someone having done arbitrary AEL-requiring modifications to the
> delaylocked partitions. If you can, the fact that the plan might
> sometimes be out-of-date is an inevitable consequence of doing this at
> all, but I think we can argue that it's an acceptable consequence as
> long as the resulting behavior is not too bletcherous. If you can't,
> then this patch is dead.
I'm a bit confused - does the patch actually change anything here? As
demonstrated earlier in this thread, it actually behaves just like
master. No?
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services