Re: Question about the enum type
| От | Tim Hart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about the enum type |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | a74dcd25564d6ac3e278df431b3ee7d7@mac.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Question about the enum type (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Question about the enum type
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Feb 17, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason "position" is special is that the SQL spec calls out weird
> specialized syntax for it:
Given the spec, I completely understand.
Given the roundabout way I discovered the nature of the problem, I'm
curious:
At the time I executed the statement
create type position as enum('pitcher', 'catcher', 'first base',
'second base', 'third base', 'short stop', 'left field', 'center
field', 'right field', 'designated hitter', 'pinch hitter');
Would it have been reasonable to expect some kind of notice or warning
message stating that 'position' was special, and
<double-quote>position<double-quote> would be used instead?
Given the non-trivial list of reserved and non-reserved words, I can
imagine that this situation has risen before - and probably will again.
This is not a rant or a gripe, BTW - I'm poking and prodding this
subject in order to be more well informed.
Tim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: