Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?
Дата
Msg-id a72c2b1c-d45b-b756-db3f-77315119498a@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 8/10/17 17:53, Thomas Munro wrote:
> The current regression tests, isolation tests and TAP tests are very
> good (though I admit my experience with TAP is limited), but IMHO we
> are lacking support for C-level unit testing.  Complicated, fiddly
> things with many states, interactions, edge cases etc can be hard to
> get full test coverage on from the outside.  Consider
> src/backend/utils/mmgr/freepage.c as a case in point.

I don't have a good idea how to address this, but I agree that something
in this area would be widely useful.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM protocol documentation
Следующее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Funny WAL corruption issue