Re: PG 17 and GUC variables
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 17 and GUC variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a71a4581-3114-4a10-842e-cb7ab69bf1dc@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG 17 and GUC variables (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG 17 and GUC variables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/08/2024 06:29, Robert Treat wrote: > I was looking at trace_connection_negotiation and ran across this > commit removing it's mention from the release notes because it is > undocumented: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=95cabf542f04b634303f899600ea62fb256a08c2 > > Why is the right solution to remove it from the release notes rather > than to document it properly? It's not like people won't notice a new > GUC has popped up in their configs. Also, presumaing I'm unerstanding > it's purpose correctly, ISTM it would fit along side other trace_* > gucs in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-developer.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-DEVELOPER. Not sure whether it's worth mentioning in release notes, but I think you're right that it should be listed in that docs section. How about the attached description? I see that there are two more developer-only GUCs that are not listed in the docs: trace_syncscan optimize_bounded_sort There's a comment on them that says "/* this is undocumented because not exposed in a standard build */", but that seems like a weak reason, given that many of the other options in that docs section also require additional build-time options. I think we should add those to the docs too for the sake of completeness. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: