Re: Add missing JIT inline pass for llvm>=17

Great find! Sadly shows how little people actually use JIT.

On 1/14/26 9:02 AM, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
> I didn't add the always-inline pass as I don't think this can have any
> effect. From what I understand, the functions need to be imported
> through llvm_inline for LLVM to be able to inline them. I've tested by
> tagging int4mod as always inline, and the generated bc was still
> calling the function despite the always-inline pass.

If inline-always does not do anything it should be removed on older LLVM 
versions too. I do not think we should be having pre- and post-LLVM 17 
run different passes. But as Thomas pointed out inline-always is likely 
used for tuple deforming.

Andreas