Re: sunsetting md5 password support
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sunsetting md5 password support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a5d2e990-f183-418f-92e4-4521bf38833c@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sunsetting md5 password support (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: sunsetting md5 password support
Re: sunsetting md5 password support |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/10/2024 00:03, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:30:15PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: >> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 21:55, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In this message, I propose a multi-year, incremental approach to remove MD5 >>> password support from Postgres. >> >> +many for the general idea >> >> I think it makes sense to also remove the "password" authentication >> option while we're at it (this can currently be used with SCRAM stored >> passwords). > > I remember "password" as being recommended for SSL connections where > there is no risk of the password contents being seen. I wouldn't recommend it if SCRAM is available, but yeah, with TLS and sslmode=verify-full, it's secure enough. Note that some authentication methods like LDAP and Radius use "password" authentication on the wire. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: