Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION - add missing test case
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION - add missing test case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a59bc69b-3099-43c7-914d-47d4838e2416@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION - add missing test case (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION - add missing test case
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/01/2025 05:11, Peter Smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:57 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote: >> Yes, there are cases with logical replication where reproducing may be >> expensive (in terms of data amounts, time, ...) but I don't think that's >> the case here - this test is trivial/cheap. >> >> But I believe the "costs" mentioned by Amit are more about having to >> maintain the tests etc. rather than execution costs. In which case >> having a flag does exactly nothing - we'd still have to maintain it. >> >> I propose we simply add the test to 008_diff_schema.pl, per v2. I see no >> reason to invent something more here. > > Hi Tomas, > > Since you think patch v2 is already OK as-is, I have changed the > commitfest entry [1] for this to RfC. Committed, thanks! It's always a balancing act between test coverage and how long the tests run. I agree this test is worth it, albeit with a thin margin. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: