Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional
Дата
Msg-id
a58c208c-4828-abe7-dde2-ec4a9a19da61@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara.dev@pm.me>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara.dev@pm.me>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara.dev@pm.me>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
On 12/28/21 14:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matheus Alcantara writes:
>>> it is not consistent with other \g* commands. Maybe a new statement \senv ? But what is the use case? You can just press ^z and inside shell write echo $xxx, and then fg
>> I think that the basic use case would be just for debugging, instead call \getenv and them \echo, we could just use \getenv. I don't see any other advantages, It would just be to
>> write fewer commands. I think that ^z and then fg is a good alternative, since this behavior would be inconsistent.
> You don't even need to do that much. This works fine:
>
> postgres=# \! echo $PATH
>
> So I'm not convinced that we need another way to spell that.
> (Admittedly, this probably doesn't work on Windows, but
> I gather that environment variables are less interesting there.)
>
>
I haven't tested, but I'm fairly sure
postgres=# \! echo %PATH%
would do the trick on Windows.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления