Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a5359ad4-4e2b-432d-92c0-188f9d558f06@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-07-21 Mo 8:53 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
I suspect this is going to end with a structured dump like we use on the pg_dump (per-database) side. It's not an accident that v17 pg_restore doesn't lex text files to do its job. pg_dumpall deals with a more-limited set of statements than pg_dump deals with, but they're not _that much_ more limited. I won't veto a lexing-based approach if it gets the behaviors right, but I don't have high hopes for it getting the behaviors right and staying that way.
I have been talking offline with Mahendra about this. I agree that we would be better off with a structured object for globals. But the thing that's been striking me all afternoon as I have pondered it is that we should not be designing such an animal at this stage of the cycle. Whatever we do we're going to be stuck supporting, so I have very reluctantly come to the conclusion that it would probably be better to back the feature out and have another go for PG 19.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: