On 3/11/18 12:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think it's worth mentioning in the docs around "it's now considered
> insecure" that it's still an option to use if compression is the main
> thing one is looking for, rather than security. As in, it doesn't make
> it any less secure than no ssl at all. (obviously not those words)
>
> +1 otherwise.
committed like that
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services