On 11/04/2024 01:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:20:55AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> To move this forward, here's a patch to switch to a pairing heap. In my very
>> quick testing, with the performance test cases posted earlier in this thread
>> [1] [2], I'm seeing no meaningful performance difference between this and
>> what's in master currently.
>
> Reading through the patch, that's a nice cleanup. It cuts quite some
> code.
>
> +++ b/src/include/replication/reorderbuffer.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include "access/htup_details.h"
> #include "lib/binaryheap.h"
> #include "lib/ilist.h"
> +#include "lib/pairingheap.h"
>
> I'm slightly annoyed by the extra amount of information that gets
> added to reorderbuffer.h for stuff that's only local to
> reorderbuffer.c, but that's not something new in this area, so..
We can actually remove the "lib/binaryheap.h" in this patch; I missed
that. There are no other uses of binaryheap in the file.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)