[HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?
Дата
Msg-id a37e9c57-22d4-1b82-1270-4501cd2e984e@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I noticed that the test "hash_func" was listed in parallel_schedule but
not in serial_schedule.  I have seen that a few times recently where a
patch proposes to add a new test file but forgets to add it to the
serial_schedule.

I wonder whether it's still useful to keep two separate test lists.  I
think we could just replace make installcheck with what make
installcheck-parallel MAX_CONNECTIONS=1 does.  Thoughts?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nico Williams
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] separate serial_schedule useful?