Re: Strange permission effect depending on DEFERRABILITY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Strange permission effect depending on DEFERRABILITY
Дата
Msg-id a3559b3c11330e59a4757b97d741c4cd6005d659.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Strange permission effect depending on DEFERRABILITY  (Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a.mantzios@cloud.gatewaynet.com>)
Ответы Re: Strange permission effect depending on DEFERRABILITY
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 16:14 +0300, Achilleas Mantzios - cloud wrote:
> The below runs on PostgreSQL 16.4
>
> We are trying to implement a certain operation based on a security definer
> function : mariner_update_availability_date
>
> This is supposed to update a table : mariner , which has several other triggers : 
>
>   [...]
>   zzzmariner_dmq_tg AFTER INSERT OR DELETE OR UPDATE ON mariner DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE
FUNCTIONexport_dmq() 
>
> As you noticed the last trigger is a CONSTRAINT DEFERRABLE trigger.
> This function mariner_update_availability_date is supposed to be run by a user :
> cbt_results_import stripped of any privileges to the rest of the system. Here is
> what we get : when we SET the constraint of the last trigger to IMMEDIATE, the
> function runs on behalf of its owner (postgres) who has all needed privileges
> (as superuser) to run the update on mariner table and also run the triggers .
> However, when we run with this CONSTRAINT as DEFERRED then it seems to NOT run
> the last deferrable trigger as postgres.

I have proposed a patch that fixes exactly that case:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/49/4888/

So far, the feedback seems to be that it is not considered a bug.
But that doesn't mean that we cannot change the behavior.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: